Synthetic Launch QA Report

Executive summary

Three planted defects. Three bounded retests.

The first run reproduced three deliberately planted failures in a local synthetic workflow. Each failure received a specific remediation and the same scenario was rerun.

Target: example.test
Data: Synthetic only
Initial: 3 failed
Retest: 3 passed

Initial and retest status for the three synthetic findings
ID	Finding	Severity	Initial	Retest
`VQA-001`	Stale audio after interruption	High	FAIL	PASS
`VQA-002`	Booking claimed without committed action	Critical	FAIL	PASS
`VQA-003`	Replay repeats a side effect	High	FAIL	PASS

VQA-002Critical

Booking claimed without committed action

Expected

The agent may say a booking succeeded only after matching backend success evidence exists.

Observed

tool=create_booking
status=error
appointment_id=null
agent_claim=confirmed

Remediation

Gate confirmation language on a successful tool result and a non-empty appointment identifier.

Retest

The failed write produced an honest recovery message. A separate committed booking still produced a confirmation.

PASS · words match state

Run this exact proof in the browser →

Result boundary

What this does not prove

No real PSTN audio or provider latency was tested
No production concurrency, secret, or customer data was used
No PHI handling or compliance requirement was assessed
No claim is made about untested prompts, tools, or integrations

Correct claim: these specific synthetic scenarios passed their stated retest conditions.

First paid pilot · $199 fixed

Replace the fixture with one workflow you control.

One authorized agent or automation flow, 10–12 selected scenarios, one agreed remediation pass, one retest, and a concise report like this.

Scope the pilot